Wdr Udma Full Version 33
WDR pro 3.0 Page 2 of 2 [ 30 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2 Print viewPrevious topic Next topic AuthorMessagewakka-wakka Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: July 11th, 2015, 8:13 Joined: July 11th, 2015, 7:55Posts: 3Location: MalaysiaSpildit wrote:WDMarvel23 IS NOT WDR.WDMarvel23 is a diferent tool (Russian) while WDR is chinese "pirated" tool based on TREX and HRT.WDR DEMO : =32&t=33WDR Full is not FREEWARE and it's PIRATED.WDMarvel23 in russian could be downloaded from that link that now is down and i don't have it. Maybe someone who download it when the site was still up can send you a copy ?Can I use "Repair" on donor PCB to regenerate ROM?The original PCB is completely shot and cannot read (embedded) ROM any more.Top Spildit Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: July 11th, 2015, 15:22 Joined: December 19th, 2006, 8:49Posts: 10960Location: Portugalwakka-wakka wrote:Spildit wrote:WDMarvel23 IS NOT WDR.WDMarvel23 is a diferent tool (Russian) while WDR is chinese "pirated" tool based on TREX and HRT.WDR DEMO : =32&t=33WDR Full is not FREEWARE and it's PIRATED.WDMarvel23 in russian could be downloaded from that link that now is down and i don't have it. Maybe someone who download it when the site was still up can send you a copy ?Can I use "Repair" on donor PCB to regenerate ROM?The original PCB is completely shot and cannot read (embedded) ROM any more.Automatic function on WDR might not be very reliable.Use manual method instead : =59&t=761_________________1Q9xrDTzTddUXeJAFRn37aqh1Yr6buDCdw - (Bitcoin Donations)paypal.me/Spildit - (PayPal Donations)The HDD Oracle - Platform for OPEN research on Data Recovery.Top wakka-wakka Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: July 14th, 2015, 23:40 Joined: July 11th, 2015, 7:55Posts: 3Location: MalaysiaSpildit wrote:Automatic function on WDR might not be very reliable.Use manual method instead : =59&t=761Thanks for the tip.I'm trying to digest the manual method WDR Demo does not read the SA MOD.Can you suggest any other tool?I'm trying to recover data from my personal HDD.I tried messaging you over at HDD oracle before posting here (last page). =32&t=84&sid=57df187b8f0257473e6600368b0d0ebb#p7607Are you no longer active there?Top Spildit Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: July 15th, 2015, 14:35 Joined: December 19th, 2006, 8:49Posts: 10960Location: Portugalwakka-wakka wrote:Spildit wrote:Automatic function on WDR might not be very reliable.Use manual method instead : =59&t=761Thanks for the tip.I'm trying to digest the manual method WDR Demo does not read the SA MOD.Can you suggest any other tool?I'm trying to recover data from my personal HDD.I tried messaging you over at HDD oracle before posting here (last page). =32&t=84&sid=57df187b8f0257473e6600368b0d0ebb#p7607Are you no longer active there?For reading modules you can use a free version of SeDiv for WD.WDR DEMO doesn't read modules, as stated.Regarding malthus forum read here : =56&t=1149Regards._________________1Q9xrDTzTddUXeJAFRn37aqh1Yr6buDCdw - (Bitcoin Donations)paypal.me/Spildit - (PayPal Donations)The HDD Oracle - Platform for OPEN research on Data Recovery.Top wakka-wakka Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: July 16th, 2015, 5:48 Joined: July 11th, 2015, 7:55Posts: 3Location: MalaysiaSpildit wrote:For reading modules you can use a free version of SeDiv for WD.WDR DEMO doesn't read modules, as stated.Regarding malthus forum read here : =56&t=1149Regards.No wonder.I did not see that message.All SeDiv trials I downloaded have malware detected.Sediv.exe got zapped by the AV even before I could even open the folder.Detected malware: UDS:DangerousObject.Multi.GenericTop ANYC3 Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: September 22nd, 2015, 6:42 Joined: November 14th, 2012, 18:01Posts: 24Location: pakistanSpildit, Hi, would u like 2 ,ve a small chat. i need some guidance & help. my email is aalamcomp@gmail.comTop excell Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: October 2nd, 2017, 16:38 Joined: September 27th, 2017, 17:57Posts: 21Location: pakistannice informationTop Spildit Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: October 2nd, 2017, 17:00 Joined: December 19th, 2006, 8:49Posts: 10960Location: Portugalexcell wrote:nice informationOutdated !!!About WDR - Pirated HRT WD Marvel tool. Read here : - ... 1576#p9323WDMarvel DEMO (and paid full version) can be obtained (legal software) from here - About Reading/Writing ROM with WDR DEMO - =86&t=1127_________________1Q9xrDTzTddUXeJAFRn37aqh1Yr6buDCdw - (Bitcoin Donations)paypal.me/Spildit - (PayPal Donations)The HDD Oracle - Platform for OPEN research on Data Recovery.Top kham1911 Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: January 1st, 2018, 14:32 Joined: January 1st, 2018, 12:43Posts: 1Location: CrakovIs there a similar program for Hitachi?Top Spildit Post subject: Re: WDR pro 3.0Posted: January 1st, 2018, 15:06 Joined: December 19th, 2006, 8:49Posts: 10960Location: Portugalkham1911 wrote:Is there a similar program for Hitachi?What do you mean by "Similar" ?If you need "something" to work with modern Hitachi/IBM/HGST drives (older IBM native Arch M24 and modern ARM based) you can try to buy a $350 SeDiv. This will NOT work with very old native Hitachi drives like 2.5 IDE DK2xxx models but you should be ok as the majority of the IBM native models will be supported except latest models (as For that you would need a very expensive PC-3000).Attachment:1.jpg [ 101.55 KiB Viewed 12010 times ]SeDiv is the cheapest alternative that i know of to work with Hitachi/IBM/HGST firmware.China HDD Union did only produce "pirated" tools for Seagate, Samsung, WD and Maxtor. There are no China HDD Union Hitachi/IBM tool.The HRT complex that was "used" or "ripped off" by China HDD Union to make WDR/SRT does have a VERY GOOD IBM tool and even a Hitachi native tool for very old DK2xxx models. HRT 3.0 have tools up till HGST latest M24 arch and HRT 5.0 UDMA does have support for ARM based as well but you will not be able to buy this tool anywhere even used.So you eirther get something like SeDiv or you invest in something more expensive like MRT Pro, PC-3000, DFL, etc ...Here you have some captures of IBM and Native Hitachi tool (HRT/HDD48) : =30&t=1226 =189&t=2150Here you have a IBM research done on M24 arch drives : =59&t=1236Attachment:1.png [ 20.26 KiB Viewed 12010 times ]Regards._________________1Q9xrDTzTddUXeJAFRn37aqh1Yr6buDCdw - (Bitcoin Donations)paypal.me/Spildit - (PayPal Donations)The HDD Oracle - Platform for OPEN research on Data Recovery.Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Page 2 of 2 [ 30 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2Main Forums home Software and hardware tools
wdr udma full version 33
WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility : Page 2 of 4 [ 68 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next Previous topic Next topic AuthorMessagemichael chiklis Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 6:33 Joined: December 5th, 2011, 5:38Posts: 1511Location: ItalyI don't like WDR, i prefer SD tool.Also Sediv it's better then WDR, i descovered a WDR bug just two days ago...I have a new WD2002FAEX-00MJRA0 drive which works perfect, i did FW backup with those 3 tools (SD - Sediv - WDR), SD and Sediv did a good backup but not WDR (i tried with all WDR version i have which are 3.0 - 3.2 - 5.3 but none of those did a good SA backup).I posted good backup on this link (SD 7.0.5 + Sediv 3.9.1): -P ... l/Unknown/Bad WDR backup:Attachment:WDR WD2002FAEX (some bad SA mod).rar [12.53 MiB]Downloaded 2371 timesI compared all mods with Hex Workshop, i found that the followings are marked as "NOT_INIT" in the WDR backup:Code:002D.bin002E.bin012D.binExample pic:Attachment:Sediv vs WDR.JPG [ 371.18 KiB Viewed 22468 times ]i don't know if this mods are important but you can see that WDR was not able to dump 3 of them in the proper way, all these bad mods have dimension of 400 KbAnother WDR bug is that it detects my WD2002FAEX-00MJRA0 drive as WD2002FAEX-00DY4A _________________My firmware database: Top Tomset Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 10:01 Joined: September 29th, 2005, 4:10Posts: 421Location: Moscowmichael chiklis, modules002D.bin002E.bin012D.binfor paging from memory.They change all the time and may not have the correct headers and checksums.Top michael chiklis Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 11:19 Joined: December 5th, 2011, 5:38Posts: 1511Location: Italywhy they do not have the correct headers only when i use WDR?and why WDR detects the drive with wrong model name?_________________My firmware database: Top fzabkar Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 12:48 Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21Posts: 14563Location: Australiamichael chiklis wrote:why WDR detects the drive with wrong model name?from MOD 02 (SA)Quote:WD-WCC1P0590147WDC WD2002FAEX-00DY4A009-18-2013from MOD 0D (ROM)Quote:01.01L01WDC WD2002FAEX-00MJRA0WCC1P0590147warranty checkQuote:WCC1P0590147WD2002FAEX-00MJRA02 TB WD Black Hard DriveIn Limited Warranty10/25/2018_________________A backup a day keeps DR away.Top fzabkar Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 13:07 Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21Posts: 14563Location: AustraliaI notice that the file sizes of MOD 2D in all 3 resource dumps is 409600. That corresponds to 800 sectors, ie 0x320.The header for MOD 2D in the WDR screenshot confirms a size of 0x0320. However, the size in the SeDiv header is 0x025F._________________A backup a day keeps DR away.Top Spildit Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 16:06 Joined: December 19th, 2006, 8:49Posts: 10960Location: PortugalWDR doesn't detect the drive by magick !!!!If WDR shows you the drive ID on a way it's because it's fetching that from SA !!I have several drives with Model name changed to "Spildit" (let's say for example) and those drives detect on BIOS as such, and on WDR as such.It's not like UDMA or DFL or SeDiv that you select a family on WDR, it simply fetch the info from MOD 0002.There are BUGS in WDR, like the saved format for modules, on some versions it will save as idmodule and others will be just the module number, but on those the "id" will be replaced by 3 spaces on the file name.There is a bug on module operation window that if you select the W/o Road map you then can't select again to read from the 2nd copy unless you close the module window and open it again.Yes, it's NOT PERFECT but i like it. Just that._________________1Q9xrDTzTddUXeJAFRn37aqh1Yr6buDCdw - (Bitcoin Donations)paypal.me/Spildit - (PayPal Donations)The HDD Oracle - Platform for OPEN research on Data Recovery.Top Spildit Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 16:08 Joined: December 19th, 2006, 8:49Posts: 10960Location: Portugal002D=SMART Log - Dump RAM002E=SMART Log - Dump RAM_________________1Q9xrDTzTddUXeJAFRn37aqh1Yr6buDCdw - (Bitcoin Donations)paypal.me/Spildit - (PayPal Donations)The HDD Oracle - Platform for OPEN research on Data Recovery.Top Spildit Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 16:12 Joined: December 19th, 2006, 8:49Posts: 10960Location: PortugalRegarding different name, maybe you have placed a compatible PCB (not native) and regen only part of the adaptives, keeping the original ROM version ?Maybe you have written to SA mod 02 ?My guess is that somehow you edited the Drive ID or MOD 02 and that is why WDR shows you that model._________________1Q9xrDTzTddUXeJAFRn37aqh1Yr6buDCdw - (Bitcoin Donations)paypal.me/Spildit - (PayPal Donations)The HDD Oracle - Platform for OPEN research on Data Recovery.Top HaQue Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 4th, 2013, 23:09 Joined: December 4th, 2012, 1:35Posts: 3779Location: Adelaide, AustraliaIt is the same discussion as backyard mechanics Vs "Profesionals at a real garge, or an IT security/Professional/Programmer/Engineer etc without a degree, or someone that does wedding Flowers from home, but doesn't work in a florist sho.Arguments for each.Some people will hire clueless people, with no initiative or foresight, no desire to do more than their job entails, etc but has a degree over someone that is wildly passionate about their "hobby""skill" or whatever you want to call it. the next hirer might choose opposite.I think these days, less work is carried out in the customers view, more is done remotely or outsourced, or just the volume of work means we dont get the luxury of knowing who is doing the work.For every person that gets warm and fuzzy about someone fixing their HDD with a PC3K, there is another prson that doesnt give 2 hoots if you got your cousin who is a black hat hacker genius to rewrite the firmware on a EEPROM and solder it to the board with fencing wire... as long as they get their data back.What all you guys are discussing is the same argument that every industry has had for years, and what I believe is a line down the middle regarding viewpoints.I like the respect on this forum both sides show to have these discussions. Many details that come out in these talks help new people, tool names, tool capabilities, industry state and what is seen as acceptable regarding the way you present yourself.Lots of people start off with the attitude that why pay for these tools when free/cracked/cheap tools work, why give in to corporate sales crap and pay for what amounts to subscription to updates and forums, why keep information from public.... Then once working their ass off for years, and realising that hey, I have this knowledge from hard work, these tools that are expensive come with benifits that is hard to put $$ value on (as BlackST alluded to.. respect, inside info, the showmanship of a pro etc).... They start to see the big picture.. I heard a good quote yesterday on liquid Matrix. To paraphrase:Quote:The freedom to express myself and conduct actions in any way I see fit extends to the tip of your nosemeaning every individual has the right to do what they want, how the want UNTIL it starts to affect ANYONE else. Once it affects anyone else the situation is changed.Sue me if I am off topic!Top michael chiklis Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 5th, 2013, 4:45 Joined: December 5th, 2011, 5:38Posts: 1511Location: ItalySpildit wrote:Regarding different name, maybe you have placed a compatible PCB (not native) and regen only part of the adaptives, keeping the original ROM version ?Maybe you have written to SA mod 02 ?My guess is that somehow you edited the Drive ID or MOD 02 and that is why WDR shows you that model.The drive is new, what i did is just FW backup.I didn't change the pcb and never played with adaptives or any mod, i didn't change the ID (only WDR shows wrong ID, Sediv and SD show correct ID)._________________My firmware database: Top Nesa Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 5th, 2013, 6:42 Joined: July 18th, 2011, 5:40Posts: 101Location: Serbiamichael chiklis wrote:The drive is new, what i did is just FW backup.I didn't change the pcb and never played with adaptives or any mod, i didn't change the ID (only WDR shows wrong ID, Sediv and SD show correct ID).fzabkar wrote:from MOD 02 (SA)WD-WCC1P0590147WDC WD2002FAEX-00DY4A009-18-2013from MOD 0D (ROM)01.01L01WDC WD2002FAEX-00MJRA0WCC1P0590147I remember my first experience with that. The drive was clicking with no SA access and with LBA=0 but DETECTED as WD5000AAKS-00C8A0. I immediately thought it was impossible because it cannot read MOD 02 but as it detects right(!) where does it finds ID? Conclusion was that it must be in the ROM because it is only readable. And yes, it was in MOD 0D.To this day I do not understand why it is important to be successfully detected when not working anyway. Given that in my case the SA was not accessible I do not know what ID was in MOD 02.In Michaels case, I'm also confused and wonder what is the purpose of difference in 0D and 02 MODs ID!Top fzabkar Post subject: Re: WDR Full X UDMA Marvel utility :Posted: December 5th, 2013, 6:57 Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21Posts: 14563Location: AustraliaNesa wrote:To this day I do not understand why it is important to be successfully d